Systemic Racism? We’re Talking Past Each Other

Systemic Racism? We’re Talking Past Each Other

by Michael F. Mascolo, Ph.D.

  • Some suggest that the Unites States is a systemically racist nation. Others say that American ideals are the foundation for a nonracist society.
  • Both sides are talking past each other.  There is a difference between saying “There are systems of racism in America” and “America is a racist system”. The first statement describes parts of society; the latter is a characterization of the whole
  • A part – even a large part – doesn’t define a whole.
  • The tension between racist and nonracist forces has permeated American society from its inception.  Understanding this tension is key to dismantling the systemic origins of the racial divides in American culture.

Racism, sexism and other “isms” run deep in our culture. However, the way we speak matters.  When we say, for example, “We live in a racist society”, we are using essentializing and totalizing language.  If we indeed live in a racist society, then our society is in some sense fundamentally racist.  

Terms like “systemic racism”, “institutionalized racism”, “White supremacy”, and related expressions have rhetorical power. These terms gain their power from several basic truths:

  1. There has been and continue to be systems of racism, sexism, classism and so forth.
  2. No one wants to think of themselves as racist, sexist, classist, or the like
  3. People want to distance themselves from any system, person, or group that can be characterized as racist, sexist, classist or in similar terms.

Essentializing statements like, “We live in a racist society” use the term “systemic” to advance a particular type of ideological agenda – one that depicts a particular society, culture or nation as fixed, monolithic or unified system.  In this ideology, society is a fixed and overarching structure of power that dominates over groups and individual who fall outside of that structure[i].  

This way of thinking allows the speaker to mobilized political force — to rally against the system. It suggests that the only way to eradicate racism, sexism and other “isms” is to dismantle the fixed and static system-that-is-essentially-racist and replace it with something else.

We must face the legacy of racism in our nation. However, totalizing calls to overturn a system regarded as inherently racist confuse the parts of society with its whole.

Fixed Systems and Dynamic Systems

At its most basic, a system is any set elements that function together.  From this view, some systems may in fact be fixed, monolithic and closed.  A clock is an example of a closed system.  It works according to fixed rules that are contained within the system itself. It does not change as a result of interactions that it has with the environment outside of itself.

A society is not a fixed, monolithic or closed system. It is a dynamic system. To be more precise, a society is a dynamic system of interpenetrating systems (which itself is embedded in larger international and even cosmic systems). The elements or “parts” of a dynamic system are not independent of one another. Instead, they influence each other over time.  As a result, the structure of a system is something that self-organizes or emerges over time. 

Everyday social interaction provides a good example of how a dynamic system works.  Imagine two people working together to move a couch. Each person is a distinct system (composed of subsystems) and is part of the larger system of the dyad (the two people interacting). As one person lifts the couch, the other senses the movements of the first, and adjusts his or her behavior accordingly. The first person then adjusts to the second until they reach a stable state (they are holding the couch). As they begin to move, they continuously adjust their actions to each other. Whenever a stable state of interacting is disrupted, and a new pattern of give and take emerges. Order self-organizes without any single “plan”; the structure of the system emerges in the very course of social interaction.

A Society is a Dynamic System

 A society is not a monolithic system; it is a dynamic one.  It is not a monolithic structure organized by a single dimension (e.g., power). Any society, of course, is organized around systems of power, but not only around power. There are racist, sexist and classist elements in society, but there are also elements of society that are decidedly non-racist, non-sexist and non-classist. There are and have been bad actors, bad practices, and bad institutions in society; but society is not defined merely by those bad actors, practices and institutions.

In short, we do not live so much in a racist society, as much as we live in a society containing systems of racism and non-racism. The very systems, practices and beliefs that brought the United States into existence contained elements of both racism (e.g., slavery) and non-racism (e.g., abolition). It was founded upon systems of sexism (e.g., only White men could vote) and feminism (e.g., “Remember the Ladies”, said Abigail Adams to her husband John). It was founded both on systems of constraint and class (i.e., only property owners could vote) and systems of social mobility (e.g., education; beliefs in “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”).

The Systemic Origins of Racial Disparities

It is upon these contradictory systems of belief and practice that our society evolved and continues to evolve. An overly simplified (!) representation a systems conception of race relations is shown in Figure 1. The figure shows how systems of racism and non-racism evolved in relation to each other over time.

Figure 1. The Systemic Co-Evolution of Racism and Non-Racism

As shown in the top panel, the slave trade was motivated by economic means and opportunity of colonialists, coupled with racialized beliefs about non-Europeans. At the founding of the United States, there was also a belief in equality. As is well known, many colonists were deeply uncomfortable with the concept of slavery.  This led to the abolitionist movement, which ultimately prevailed with the outcome of the civil war. Nonetheless, racism and racialized beliefs remained even after the civil war, which were resisted by anti-discrimination laws and other social movements (i.e., the civil rights movement).

This leads us to where we are today. We have made enormous progress in relations among racialized groups. Contemporary racial relations are systemic; they are products of how diverse elements of society mutually influence each other.  This is shown in Figure 1 by the simplified relations highlighted in the light circle.  As a result of an overdetermined set of historical process, some racialized groups (Blacks, Latinos) are more likely to (a) have less current and intergenerational wealth[ii], (b) experience lower levels of education and academic achievement[iii], (c) are underemployed[iv]; (d) have poorer quality health[v]; (e) inadequate access to quality healthcare[vi]; (f) live in disadvantaged neighborhoods[vii]; (g) engage in higher rates of crime[viii]; (h) and experience higher rates of incarceration[ix].  Against this backdrop, poor families tend to face higher levels of stress[x] and have more difficulty supporting their children through the psycho-social challenges of poverty[xi].  

These processes occur against the backdrop of broad systems of racial bias and discrimination within social institutions and social practices. These practices include but are not limited to implicit and explicit discrimination in hiring and promotion[xii]; patterns of observed and experienced discrimination in the workplace[xiii]; differential access to healthcare and nutrition[xiv]; differential treatment of racialized groups with the criminal justice system[xv]; differential access to credit[xvi] and housing[xvii]; zoning laws that limit access to housing[xviii]; intergenerational disparities in wealth and inheritance[xix]; and other forms of systemic discrimination.

These variables are not independent of each other. Instead, they mutually influence each other to produce racial and class-based disparities[xx].  A person coming from a family stressed with underemployment, inadequate education, and inadequate family resources is more likely to gain the initial skills needed to perform well in school[xxi]. In turn, parental education affects employment and income of children, which influences intergenerational cycles of poverty and wealth[xxii]. To the extent that public education is funded using local property taxes, people who live in poorer communities will tend to have fewer resources for education – both in and outside of the schools.  Poor access to health care and nutrition is associated with cognitive and socio-emotional challenges, which make it more difficult to succeed educationally and vocationally[xxiii].  Strained social systems are associated with increased levels of crime and incarceration[xxiv].

Disrupting the System

Systemic racism is often thought of as the idea that that patterns of discrimination that are built into the fabric of social institutions and thus define them.  From this viewpoint, if we could simply remove institutional discrimination – the power of biased institutions to oppress – we would be able to transform racial inequities.

To be sure, we must work to remove institutional patterns of racism. However, there is a problem with this way of thinking. The sad truth is that removing patterns of institutional discrimination can only bring us so far. This is because the history of racism has created challenges that extend beyond institutions that oppress: they have penetrated racialized communities themselves.  Merely ending institutional discrimination will not remove the achievement gap, group differences in criminal activity, rates of single parenthood, and other challenges to poor and racialized communities. Transformations must also occur in communities that have been victimized by historical and present-day racism.

The systemic transformation of poor communities requires collaborative action on multiple fronts. These include but are not limited to the infusion of businesses into poor communities; community-based job training and education or people who need it; parental support and high quality daycare; systematic early intervention for infants and preschoolers; education committed to enforcing high standards and providing students with the support and direction – both in and out of school; partnerships between communities and law enforcement that breed mutual understanding and respect; economic and social opportunity that channelizes development toward purposive and meaningful careers, and much more.

Systems are composed of relations among multiple processes. Systems change when changes in important parts of the system ripple through and create changes in the remainder of the system.  When this happens, over time, minor changes can eventually produce massive shifts.  We may not know exactly which parts of our existing social systems need to change to initiate such ripple effects. To transform racial disparities, we need to identify those system elements that can changes throughout the social system.

Racial Disparities are Systemically Caused ¹ We Live in a Racist Society

The concept of a “systemic isms’” has noble intent. It is used, in part, to locate an “ism” not in particular individuals, but instead of the broader institutions that make up a society. From this view, racism does not (necessarily) exist in you or in me – but in a broader system that functions (to some extent) independent of you or me.  In this way, to eliminate racism, one does not simply seek to change individual prejudices, but instead seeks to transform institutionalized practices and mindsets that oppress and discriminate.

A problem these ideas is that they substitute a part of the problem for the whole.  “Systemic racism” because a kind of “thing” – a static system of power that is used by some groups of people to oppress others.  When this happens, the concept of “systemic racism” becomes an instrument of power – a rhetorical bludgeon that casts entire institutions as either good or bad. Thinking in this way, the only course of moral action is revolutionary: dismantle the bad institution and rebuild it in the image of the good.

This is what happens when people utter statements like, “The US is a racist society” or “The US was founded upon racism”.  Such statements are essentializing ones. They suggest that society has a particular nature and that its nature is both monolithic and bad.  However, as we have seen, as a dynamic system, a society is a mixing, moving set of consilient and contradictory processes. There is no single plan that organizes the system.  Yes – some processes are more dominant than others. Regardless, dynamic systems self-organize without a central plan. We should not so easily say, “The US is a racist nation”.  Instead, we should say, “The US is a nation that contains systems of racism, non-racism and anti-racism”.

To eliminate isms, focus on the complexity of the systemic processes.  Find the important subsystems. Modify them. Monitor the results. Rinse and repeat. Be tireless.

[i] This use of the term “systemic” is perhaps paradoxical, as those who speak of culture as systematically this or that also tend to warn against the use of essentializing and totalizing language – the language of stereotypes.  We habitually disdain any attempt to identify any particular group of people in terms of any fixed or essential characteristics.  However, people often allow this to occur when we speak of social institutions.

[ii] Chiteji, N. S. (2010). The racial wealth gap and the borrower’s dilemma. Journal of Black Studies41(2), 351–366; Herring, C., & Henderson, L. (2016). Wealth inequality in black and white: Cultural and structural sources of the racial wealth gap. Race and Social Problems8(1), 4–17.

[iii] Grogan-Kaylor, A., & Woolley, M. E. (2010). The social ecology of race and ethnicity school achievement gaps: Economic, neighborhood, school, and family factors. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment20(7), 875–896; Henry, D. A., Betancur Cortés, L., & Votruba-Drzal, E. (2020). Black–White achievement gaps differ by family socioeconomic status from early childhood through early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology112(8), 1471–1489.; Paschall, K. W., Gershoff, E. T., & Kuhfeld, M. (2018). A Two Decade Examination of Historical Race/Ethnicity Disparities in Academic Achievement by Poverty Status. Journal of Youth & Adolescence47(6), 1164–1177.

[iv] Hochschild, J. L. (2017). Race, class, politics, and the disappearance of work. Ethnic & Racial Studies40(9), 1492–1501.; McGregor, B. S., & Holden, K. B. (2015). Unemployment, underemployment, and job insecurity. In M. T. Compton & R. S. Shim (Eds.), The social determinants of mental health. (pp. 99–119). American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; Slack, T., & Jensen, L. (2011). Underemployment among minorities and immigrants. In D. C. Maynard & D. C. Feldman (Eds.), Underemployment: Psychological, economic, and social challenges. (pp. 127–143). Springer Science + Business Media.

[v] Boustan, L.P., & Margo, R.A. (2014). Racial Differences in Health in Long-Run Perspective: A Brief Introduction. Microeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal; Cave, L., Cooper, M. N., Zubrick, S. R., & Shepherd, C. C. J. (2020). Racial discrimination and child and adolescent health in longitudinal studies: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine250.; Cobb, S., Javanbakht, A., Soltani, E. K., Bazargan, M., & Assari, S. (2020). Racial difference in the relationship between health and happiness in the United States. Psychology Research and Behavior Management13.; Lillie-Blanton M, Parsons PE, Gayle H, Dievler A. Racial differences in health: not just black and white, but shades of gray. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996;17:411-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.002211. PMID: 8724234;

[vi] Chen J, Vargas-Bustamante A, Mortensen K, Ortega AN. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care Access and Utilization Under the Affordable Care Act. (2016). Medical Care. 54, :140-146. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000467.

[vii] Friedson, M., & Sharkey, P. (2015). Violence and Neighborhood Disadvantage after the Crime Decline. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science660(1), 341–358.; Umbach, R., Raine, A., Gur, R. C., & Portnoy, J. (2018). Neighborhood Disadvantage and Neuropsychological Functioning as Part Mediators of the Race-Antisocial Relationship: A Serial Mediation Model. Journal of Quantitative Criminology34(2), 481–512.

[viii] Beck, A. J., (2021). Race and ethnicity of violent crime offenders and arrestees, 2018. Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Statistics,; Vogel, M., Thompson, K. J., & Messner, S. F. (2020). The Enduring Influence of Cohort Characteristics on Race-Specific Homicide Rates. Social Forces99(1), 1–30.

[ix] Beck, A. J., & Blumstein, A. (2018). Racial disproportionality in US state prisons: Accounting for the effects of racial and ethnic differences in criminal involvement, arrests, sentencing, and time served. Journal of Quantitative Criminology34(3), 853–883.; Enders, W., Pecorino, P., & Souto, A.-C. (2019). Racial Disparity in U.S. Imprisonment Across States and Over Time. Journal of Quantitative Criminology35(2), 365–392.; Hetey, R. C., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2018). The numbers don’t speak for themselves: Racial disparities and the persistence of inequality in the criminal justice system. Current Directions in Psychological Science27(3), 183–187.; Muller, C., & Roehrkasse, A. F. (2022). Racial and Class Inequality in US Incarceration in the Early Twenty-First Century. Social Forces101(2), 803–828.

[x] Bates, R. A., Ford, J. L., Jiang, H., Pickler, R., Justice, L. M., Dynia, J. M., & Ssekayombya, P. (2021). Sociodemographics and chronic stress in mother–toddler dyads living in poverty. Developmental Psychobiology63(6).; Geronimus, A. T., Pearson, J. A., Linnenbringer, E., Eisenberg, A. K., Stokes, C., Hughes, L. D., & Schulz, A. J. . (2020). Weathering in Detroit: Place, race, ethnicity, and poverty as conceptually fluctuating social constructs shaping variation in allostatic load. Milbank Quarterly98(4), 1171–1218.; Le, T. P., & Iwamoto, D. K. (2022). Racial discrimination, gender role conflict, and depression in college men of color: A longitudinal test of the racist-gender stress model. Psychology of Men & Masculinities23(1), 4–12.; McDonald, A., Thompson, A. J., Perzow, S. E. D., Joos, C., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2020). The protective roles of ethnic identity, social support, and coping on depression in low-income parents: A test of the adaptation to poverty-related stress model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology88(6), 504–515.; Polanco-Roman, L., Miranda, R., Hien, D., & Anglin, D. M. (2021). Racial/ethnic discrimination as race-based trauma and suicide-related risk in racial/ethnic minority young adults: The explanatory roles of stress sensitivity and dissociation. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy13(7), 759–767.

[xi] Ball Cooper, E., Abate, A., Airrington, M. D., Taylor, L., & Venta, A. C. (2018). When and How Do Race/Ethnicity Relate to Dysfunctional Discipline Practices? Journal of Child & Family Studies27(3), 966–978.; Bonner, T., DeLisi, M., Jones-Johnson, G., Caudill, J. W., & Trulson, C. (2020). Chaotic Homes, Adverse Childhood Experiences, and Serious Delinquency: Differential Effects by Race and Ethnicity. JQ: Justice Quarterly37(4), 697–714.; Zajicek-Farber, M. L., Mayer, L. M., & Daughtery, L. G. (2012). Connections among parental mental health, stress, child routines, and early emotional behavioral regulation of preschool children in low-income families. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research3(1), 31–50.

[xii] Quillian, L., Lee, J. J., & Oliver, M. (2020). Evidence from Field Experiments in Hiring Shows Substantial Additional Racial Discrimination after the Callback. Social Forces99(2), 732–759.; Veit, S., Arnu, H., Di Stasio, V., Yemane, R., & Coenders, M. (2022). The “Big Two” in hiring discrimination: Evidence from a cross-national field experiment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin48(2), 167–182.; Wingfield, A. H., & Chavez, K. (2020). Getting In, Getting Hired, Getting Sideways Looks: Organizational Hierarchy and Perceptions of Racial Discrimination. American Sociological Review85(1), 31–57.; Zwysen, W., Di Stasio, V., & Heath, A. (2021). Ethnic penalties and hiring discrimination: Comparing results from observational studies with field experiments in the UK. Sociology55(2), 263–282.;

[xiii] DeCuir-Gunby, J. T., Johnson, O. T., Womble Edwards, C., McCoy, W. N., & White, A. M. (2020). African American professionals in higher education: experiencing and coping with racial microaggressions. Race, Ethnicity & Education23(4), 492–508.; Filut, A., Alvarez, M., & Carnes, M. (2020). Discrimination toward physicians of color: A systematic review. Journal of the National Medical Association112(2), 117–140.; Ozturk, M. B., & Berber, A. (2022). Racialised professionals’ experiences of selective incivility in organisations: A multi-level analysis of subtle racism. Human Relations75(2), 213–239.; Ridgeway, C. L., Korn, R. M., & Williams, J. C. (2022). Documenting the Routine Burden of Devalued Difference in the Professional Workplace. Gender & Society36(5), 627–651.

[xiv] Hernandez, S. M., & Sparks, P. J. (2020). Barriers to Health Care Among Adults With Minoritized Identities in the United States, 2013–2017. American Journal of Public Health110(6), 857–862.; Ohlson, M. (2020). Effects of Socioeconomic Status and Race on Access to Healthcare in the United States. Perspectives (University of New Hampshire)12(1), 1–13.

[xv] Lofstrom, M., Martin, B., & Raphael, S. (2020). Effect of sentencing reform on racial and ethnic disparities in involvement with the criminal justice system: The case of California’s proposition 47. Criminology & Public Policy19(4), 1165–1207.; Ormerod, D. (2020). Racism in the Criminal Justice System. Criminal Law Review8, 659–662.; Rose, J. C. C., MacManus, C., MacDonald, J., & Parry-Cruwys, D. (2022). Mitigating racial inequity by addressing racism in the criminal justice system: A behavior analytic approach. Behavior Analysis in Practice15(2), 635–641.

[xvi] Nam, Y. (2021). Parents’ financial assistance for college and Black-White wealth disparity. Children and Youth Services Review128.;

[xvii] Lee, E. K., Donley, G., Ciesielski, T. H., Gill, I., Yamoah, O., Roche, A., Martinez, R., & Freedman, D. A. (2022). Health outcomes in redlined versus non-redlined neighborhoods: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science & Medicine294.; Quillian, L., Lee, J. J., & Honoré, B. (2020). Racial discrimination in the US Housing and mortgage lending markets: A quantitative review of trends, 1976–2016. Race and Social Problems12(1), 13–28.;

[xviii] Einstein, K. L. (2021). The Privileged Few: How Exclusionary Zoning Amplifies the Advantaged and Blocks New Housing—and What We Can Do About It. Urban Affairs Review57(1), 252–268.

[xix] Modi, R., & Sewell, A. A. (2022). Unequal early adulthoods: Racial and ethnic wealth disparities during the Great Recession. The Sociological Quarterly63(1), 21–47.; Perry, S. P., & Wages, J. E. (2020). Zero-sum beliefs of racial progress. Nature Human Behaviour4(2), 130–131.

[xx] Alexander, P. (2011). Childhood Maltreatment, Intimate Partner Violence, Work Interference and Women’s Employment. Journal of Family Violence26(4), 255–261.; Deutsch, A., Crockett, L., Wolff, J., & Russell, S. (2012). Parent and Peer Pathways to Adolescent Delinquency: Variations by Ethnicity and Neighborhood Context. Journal of Youth & Adolescence41(8), 1078–1094.; Fasang, A. E., & Aisenbrey, S. (2022). Uncovering Social Stratification: Intersectional Inequalities in Work and Family Life Courses by Gender and Race. Social Forces101(2), 575–605.;  Vogel, M., Thompson, K. J., & Messner, S. F. (2020). The Enduring Influence of Cohort Characteristics on Race-Specific Homicide Rates. Social Forces99(1), 1–30.; Western, B., & Muller, C. (2013). Mass Incarceration, Macrosociology, and the Poor. Annals of the American Academy of Political & Social Science647(1), 166–189.

[xxi] Carter, P. L. (2018). The Multidimensional Problems of Educational Inequality Require Multidimensional Solutions. Educational Studies54(1), 1–16;

[xxii]  Lu, Y., & Li, X. (2021). Vertical Education-Occupation Mismatch and Wage Inequality by Race/Ethnicity and Nativity among Highly Educated US Workers. Social Forces100(2), 706–737.;  Oddo, V. M., Zhuang, C. C., Andrea, S. B., Eisenberg-Guyot, J., Peckham, T., Jacoby, D., & Hajat, A. (2021). Changes in precarious employment in the United States: A longitudinal analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health47(3), 171–180; ; Yaish, M., Shiffer-Sebba, D., Gabay-Egozi, L., & Park, H. (2021). Intergenerational Educational Mobility and Life-Course Income Trajectories in the United States. Social Forces100(2), 765–793.

[xxiii] Faareha S., Rehana, S A., Zohra, L. S., Jai, D. K. (2020). The Intertwined Relationship Between Malnutrition and Poverty, Frontiers in Public Health, 8,  

[xxiv] Haggerty, K. P., Skinner, M. L., McGlynn-Wright, A., Catalano, R. F., & Crutchfield, R. D. (2013). Parent and peer predictors of violent behavior of Black and White teens. Violence and Victims28(1), 145–160.; Mills-Koonce, W. R., Willoughby, M. T., Garrett-Peters, P., Wagner, N., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2016). The interplay among socioeconomic status, household chaos, and parenting in the prediction of child conduct problems and callous-unemotional behaviors. Development & Psychopathology28(3), 757–771.

Leave a reply

2 + 5 =

Giving is a Form of Creating Common Ground

If you like what we are doing, please support us in any way that you can.

Join Our Community of Caring People

Fill The Form To Join The Community